Without knowing your history of your product and only speculating at this point.. But it sounds like your organization is a non-compliant state. For example if you went off the maintenance plan in 2015 you are only entitled to use the release version of the software when you went off that plan. If the 2009 version was never upgrade or put on any plan than yes you are entitled to use it (just remember newer OS and Autodesk support will not exist).
eagle point autocad 2009 crack
I understand that software will change with the times. I started on release 10 and used the Softdesk add-on and Eagle point add-on. In 2001 we started using Land Desktop and loved it. We did not like Civil 3D and were told that starting in 2010 Land Desktop would go away and it was Civil 3D only. This is why we stopped at 2009. We deal with companies that still work in 2001.
Thank you for the information everyone. to correct some of my terminology and answer a few more questions. Our company had purchased three seats of 2001 back in 2001 through a reseller. In 2004 we upgraded and started the maintenance plan on the three seats we had so our serial number was a valid, current copy. We had no desire to go past LDT 2009 but kept the maintenance plan going because our reseller told us we needed to. Based on what I am reading it sounds like we should have stopped back then since we were just wasting money at that point since we weren't going to go past 2009. I wish the reseller was still around to discuss that with!
Ok, I have an issue regarding inspecting for Concentricity on samples of extruded tubing. The inspection callout at inspection says to use the following formula; (thinnest wall/thickest wall)*100. Is it just me, or does this formula tell you nothing beyond how close % wise the two measured values are? not to mention the fact that the measurements are taken from only two points on a small cross sectional slice of the tube. Since, if I am not on crack, this formula tells you nothing about how concentric the tubing is, what would you suggest as using for a physical determination of concentricity on an incoming goods inspection? I would expect runout as being the easiest to physically measure. Opinions, thoughts?
2ff7e9595c
Comments